Trump po spotkaniu z Dmitrijewem zapowiedział „wielką, wspaniałą umowę” obejmującą Europę

Dlaczego to ważne

Reported Russian demands would link any ceasefire to further Ukrainian territorial concessions, while threats against bridges, ports, railways, energy infrastructure and power plants could endanger civilian infrastructure and intensify the war. A new European security framework could reshape both the negotiations to end the war and the continent’s future security order. European officials fear the process could weaken European security, reduce NATO’s presence or allow Moscow to regain influence, and insist that decisions affecting European security require European participation.

Co się stało

Donald Trump met Kirill Dmitriev, a representative of Vladimir Putin, at the White House on the evening of 5 November. Afterwards, Trump said the parties would conclude an agreement concerning not only Ukraine but possibly all of Europe, describing it as a “great, wonderful deal”. Jared Kushner said Washington was preparing practical arrangements intended to address all parties’ security concerns and create a long-term European security and stability system.

The proposal emerged amid reported Russian demands. Putin reportedly requires Ukraine to transfer the remainder of Donbas as a precondition for a ceasefire, expects further Ukrainian territorial concessions in exchange for NATO security guarantees and threatened Ukraine’s infrastructure if it refuses. Work talks between Ukraine and Russia under US mediation are scheduled for 10–11 November in Abu Dhabi.

European capitals reacted with scepticism and concern. European officials said security affecting the EU must be decided by the EU itself and rejected parallel negotiations on European security while the war continues. Politico discussed the US proposal with 12 NATO diplomats, EU ambassadors and European officials.

Jak piszą o tym źródła ukraińskie

Ukrainian coverage focuses on Russia’s demands for additional territorial concessions and reported threats against Ukrainian infrastructure, including the possibility of large-scale winter strikes on the energy system. It presents the US initiative as unfolding alongside pressure on Ukraine and raises concerns that the negotiations could subordinate Ukrainian interests. European warnings that negotiations should not exclude the security interests of Ukraine and Eastern Europe also feature prominently.

Jak piszą o tym źródła międzynarodowe

International coverage centres on the proposed US-Russian framework for European security and the response of European officials and diplomats. It highlights European demands for direct involvement in decisions about European security, objections to changes in NATO or a reduction of its presence, and concern that Russia could use the negotiations to restore its sphere of influence, limit neighbouring NATO countries’ sovereignty or secure a deal at Europe’s expense.

Kontekst

Trump’s meeting with Dmitriev and the reported US-Russian proposals for a new European security system emerged alongside renewed attempts to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine. Two rounds of working talks on a peace agreement for Ukraine took place in Brussels during the week. European officials insisted that the architecture of European security should not be discussed during the war or without European participation, while participants reportedly rejected any changes to NATO or a reduction of its presence.